🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has stated it is claiming damages amounting to $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This action constitutes a direct response from the Kremlin against plans to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign funds to aid Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

According to accounts in Russian state media, the monetary authority filed a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the stated $230 billion demand.

European Union officials will determine in the coming days on a proposal to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its military and economic needs.

Most of these assets, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution acts as the main custodian for the Russian frozen financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

European Union officials have argued that their plan is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, despite being it was immobilized in EU jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has called any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened reciprocal measures, such as seizing European corporate assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a key role in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its assets. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Strategic Positioning

With statements interpreted as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a vicious attack on property rights and the global financial system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to comment on the latest lawsuit. It has previously noted it is facing more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

While courts in European nations are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian courts, analysts anticipate Moscow to pursue enforcement in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, if such holdings can be identified," stated a lawyer from an international firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials indicated they are working on measures to discourage other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against European companies. They are also crafting protections to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the detailed plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched.

Kyiv would solely be required to return the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay reparations for the vast damage caused during the ongoing war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an different approach for financing Ukraine. This entails common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is equally significant," she stated. "Furthermore, it sends a powerful message that when you do all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."